Why would players talking about why their past org not performing well put them in jeopardy? No one is inherently flaming Seagull. They're just honestly talking about issues faced.
Would you not hire someone after they told you what they found lacking in their previous job?
i dont realy like thorin, he is a dick and no cs go ingame knowladge so i dont know why tournaments take him as analyst but he has a lot of good points about seagul, also seagull is seriously overrated (he is far from star player)
what? clearly some of these things make seagull look pretty bad, like letting your significant other have word in team decisions. whoever gave these details don't want to be known as that guy who publicizes basically private information. or be negatively perceived by supporters/the organization