Thorin's Seagull Rant

What do you guys think? I feel like it was a lot to say without giving us proper evidence.

we already derailed this thread: https://www.over.gg/3374/seagull-leaves-nrg-starting-six-as-mendokusaii-joins

OrangePears [#1]

What do you guys think? I feel like it was a lot to say without giving us proper evidence.

i don't understand why people ask for evidence when people clearly won't give it because it'll put OTHER'S lives in jeopardy.

either trust thorin or don't - asking for evidence makes no sense.

i dont realy like thorin, he is a dick and no cs go ingame knowladge so i dont know why tournaments take him as analyst but he has a lot of good points about seagul, also seagull is seriously overrated (he is far from star player)

Seagull next guest on oversight :)

harsha [#3]

i don't understand why people ask for evidence when people clearly won't give it because it'll put OTHER'S lives in jeopardy.

either trust thorin or don't - asking for evidence makes no sense.

Why would players talking about why their past org not performing well put them in jeopardy? No one is inherently flaming Seagull. They're just honestly talking about issues faced.

Would you not hire someone after they told you what they found lacking in their previous job?

OrangePears [#6]

Why would players talking about why their past org not performing well put them in jeopardy? No one is inherently flaming Seagull. They're just honestly talking about issues faced.

Would you not hire someone after they told you what they found lacking in their previous job?

Someone has never been employed.

what? clearly some of these things make seagull look pretty bad, like letting your significant other have word in team decisions. whoever gave these details don't want to be known as that guy who publicizes basically private information. or be negatively perceived by supporters/the organization