irishfire [#2]Now all I'm waiting for is the ORG to explain themselves, that will be fun
They'll just follow the route denial esports took. They were a pretty aptly named organisation tbh
LaurenceR [#3]They'll just follow the route denial esports took. They were a pretty aptly named organisation tbh
Yikes
irishfire [#2]Now all I'm waiting for is the ORG to explain themselves, that will be fun
https://twitter.com/JigsawEsports/status/961544235085451264 i am on Lateks Leodeddz and Invision side ( only them no IPN or others) but is always better see all the sides before judge
poi98 [#6]https://twitter.com/JigsawEsports/status/961544235085451264 i am on Lateks Leodeddz and Invision side ( only them no IPN or others) but is always better see all the sides before judge
why u no on ipn side?
SKYTRiXSHA [#7]why u no on ipn side?
Cause he played 2 games out of 10....how the hell he has been robbed of something he didnt achieve?
I usualy believe that in these cases there's a lot of wrong doings on both sides, and with the lack of information we have if I have to side with someone it's usually the weakest party, which I guess means IPN?
But again, whoever you side with and whatever you think, this indeed very sad. :(
Best of luck to all players involved in this!
Guess it begs the question, who does/should the spot belong to? I mean if you're an organization paying players to play for you should you lose that spot if those guys get a better offer somewhere else and take the spot away meaning you as an org are left with nothing to show for 6 months of support and finances?
Also sucks for the players to play hard out for 6 months and have nothing to show for it.
Not saying the 6 months is related to this particular example it's just that, an example. Personally I think the org should always keep the spot.
Discord