I see where you're coming from, in that it's not really a useful analogy, I definitely agree. But I think that that is better than a misleading analogy- one that I think misrepresented the situation because this was a public figure actively damaging a core feature of blizzard's product.
My opinion is somewhat irrelevant to that topic, but I do think it's excessively harsh that the ban extends to the next season of Contenders.